More number of digits in the date change with the 'onset' of the new year than any other day (of the year).
What I write here is, at least for me, an outcome of moments of greatest clarity of thoughts. But as a reader, depending on how life has treated you, and how you have treated life, some things might make complete sense, and see you agreeing with me, in which case, you can consider all this a CONFLUENCE of CONCLUSIONS. If nothing makes sense at all, you can call these CONFUSED CONCLUSIONS. Either ways, the title of this blog would do justice to the content.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Free will
Illusion of free will arises from an awareness of multiplicity of available choices for actions/reactions, and the wrongful belief that those choices could actually have been made. The choice to not act/react is usually overlooked.
It does not mean, I am not enjoying to act, to react and to live. :)
Related: Free will - a blog post from Neglected Serendipity.
PS: Thanks Stupidosaur for bringing a critical aspect of free will to my notice.
It does not mean, I am not enjoying to act, to react and to live. :)
Related: Free will - a blog post from Neglected Serendipity.
PS: Thanks Stupidosaur for bringing a critical aspect of free will to my notice.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Dichotomy: Love and Loyalty
I love, not people, but their attributes, actions and thoughts.
These attributes, actions and thoughts might inspire loyalty.
People can change. So can the attributes, actions and thoughts I love. Love is labile.
Loyalty is greatly dictated by force of habit. It resists change, and ends up seeming like it is towards people.
This dichotomy injects restlessness and discomfort into life.
The solution, though not perfect, lies in the fact that: to love is not an obligation; loyalty is an obligation, but only as long as I assure of my loyalty.
Obligation ceases when the assurance is withdrawn.
But this is all theory; practice is quite different. ;) Because this withdrawal requires audacity that I might not always possess.
So, each time I suffer on account of this dichotomy, the real reason is my cowardice.
Ah! This fact is comforting and easier to live with. :)
These attributes, actions and thoughts might inspire loyalty.
People can change. So can the attributes, actions and thoughts I love. Love is labile.
Loyalty is greatly dictated by force of habit. It resists change, and ends up seeming like it is towards people.
This dichotomy injects restlessness and discomfort into life.
The solution, though not perfect, lies in the fact that: to love is not an obligation; loyalty is an obligation, but only as long as I assure of my loyalty.
Obligation ceases when the assurance is withdrawn.
But this is all theory; practice is quite different. ;) Because this withdrawal requires audacity that I might not always possess.
So, each time I suffer on account of this dichotomy, the real reason is my cowardice.
Ah! This fact is comforting and easier to live with. :)
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Power and Responsibility
With great power comes great responsibility. To take up that responsibility is purely upon one's whim.
Saturday, December 19, 2009
Plans and Fantasies
Planning is a chain of micro-fantasies, with this optimistic assumption that all the possible attendant obstacles were anticipated.
Fantasies do not believe in existence of obstacles.
Fantasies do not believe in existence of obstacles.
Friday, December 18, 2009
Theism, Atheism, Agnosticism and Reason
Theism seeks a reason for the Universe to exist, but requires one to forego reason for the way it exists.
Atheism seeks reason for the way the Universe exists, but requires one to forego the reason it exists.
Both are laced with a fundamental form of self-inconsistency in application of reasoning. One only chooses one's self-inconsistency.
Agnosticism is the hybrid approach, which requires one to seek reasons for none.
Atheism seeks reason for the way the Universe exists, but requires one to forego the reason it exists.
Both are laced with a fundamental form of self-inconsistency in application of reasoning. One only chooses one's self-inconsistency.
Agnosticism is the hybrid approach, which requires one to seek reasons for none.
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Love v/s Infatuation
When you know and understand someone, and are drawn to them, and fear that if not for them, life would become less worthy of living, it is LOVE.
When you want someone to be the person you could be drawn to, and wish that by their entering your life, your life would become more worthy of living, it is INFATUATION.
Difference is subtle, but not very difficult to make out for those who understand themselves well.
The most exciting, yet fulfilling phase of a relationship is when it is part love, and part, infatuation.
And no, it need not be definitely with someone of the opposite gender. :)
When you want someone to be the person you could be drawn to, and wish that by their entering your life, your life would become more worthy of living, it is INFATUATION.
Difference is subtle, but not very difficult to make out for those who understand themselves well.
The most exciting, yet fulfilling phase of a relationship is when it is part love, and part, infatuation.
And no, it need not be definitely with someone of the opposite gender. :)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)